{"id":7388,"date":"2025-03-27T10:12:27","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-3223-23-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:12:27","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:12:27","slug":"case-no-904-3223-23-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-3223-23-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 904\/3223\/23 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Termination of Land Lease Agreement and Its Return to the Owner Due to Non-Payment of Lease Payments.<\/p>\n<p>Key Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>The court drew attention to fundamentally important aspects regarding the interpretation of systematic non-payment of lease fees. First, systematic non-payment means two or more instances of non-payment. Second, in cases of partial non-payment (underpayment), the general rule of material breach of contract applies, rather than the special provision on systematic non-payment. Third, the court emphasized the necessity of detailed clarification of the period and amount of non-payment\/underpayment of lease fees.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the resolution of the appellate commercial court and remand the case for a new hearing to establish the detailed circumstances of non-payment of lease payments.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/126020124\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Termination of Land Lease Agreement and Its Return to the Owner Due to Non-Payment of Lease Payments. Key Court Arguments: The court drew attention to fundamentally important aspects regarding the interpretation of systematic non-payment of lease fees. First, systematic non-payment means two or more instances of non-payment. Second, in cases of partial&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}