{"id":7378,"date":"2025-03-27T10:09:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:09:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-7738-24-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:09:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:09:48","slug":"case-no-910-7738-24-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-7738-24-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/7738\/24 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Decisions of the General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC “VK “Ukrnaftaburinnia” and Cancellation of Registration Actions.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The plaintiff’s corporate rights were arrested in criminal proceedings
\n– Assets were transferred to the management of PJSC “Ukrnafta” by order of the Cabinet of Ministers in exceptional cases
\n– The manager has the right to act without coordination with the shareholder in such a special procedure
\n– The plaintiff is temporarily restricted in corporate rights and cannot challenge the meeting decisions<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Reject the claim, leave previous court decisions unchanged.<\/p>\n

Key Conclusion: In exceptional cases of managing arrested assets, the owner loses the right to control corporate processes.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Decisions of the General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC “VK “Ukrnaftaburinnia” and Cancellation of Registration Actions. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The plaintiff’s corporate rights were arrested in criminal proceedings – Assets were transferred to the management of PJSC “Ukrnafta” by order of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}