{"id":7364,"date":"2025-03-27T10:04:10","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:04:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-916-808-24-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:04:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:04:10","slug":"case-no-916-808-24-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-916-808-24-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 916\/808\/24 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Landlord’s Notification of Unilateral Termination of State Property Lease Agreement.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n – The Supreme Court established that the special law “On Lease of State and Municipal Property” takes precedence over general provisions of the Civil Code. This law does not provide for the possibility of unilateral termination of a state property lease agreement without a court decision. The lease agreement can be terminated only by mutual consent of the parties or by court decision.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: To declare invalid the landlord’s notification of unilateral termination of the lease agreement dated 08.02.2024 No. 11-07-00516.<\/p>\n

Key Thesis: The landlord does not have the right to independently terminate a state property lease agreement without a court decision.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Landlord’s Notification of Unilateral Termination of State Property Lease Agreement. 2. Key Court Arguments: – The Supreme Court established that the special law “On Lease of State and Municipal Property” takes precedence over general provisions of the Civil Code. This law does not provide for…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7364\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}