{"id":7356,"date":"2025-03-27T10:02:08","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:02:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-160-13345-24-dated-20-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T10:02:08","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:02:08","slug":"case-no-160-13345-24-dated-20-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-160-13345-24-dated-20-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 160\/13345\/24 dated 20\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: A servicemember demanded accrual and payment of indexation of monetary compensation for the period from 2016 to 2019.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– Indexation of monetary compensation is a state guarantee of military personnel’s remuneration
\n– In March 2018, there was an increase in income that affects the calculation of indexation
\n– The respondent’s powers regarding indexation payment are not discretionary
\n– Previous instance courts incorrectly refused to determine the specific amount of indexation<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court canceled the decisions of previous instances regarding the refusal to determine the specific amount of indexation and referred the case for a new review to calculate the amounts due to the plaintiff in detail.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: A servicemember demanded accrual and payment of indexation of monetary compensation for the period from 2016 to 2019. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – Indexation of monetary compensation is a state guarantee of military personnel’s remuneration – In March 2018, there was an increase in income…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}