{"id":7350,"date":"2025-03-27T09:59:20","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T07:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-280-3869-24-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-27T09:59:20","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T07:59:20","slug":"case-no-280-3869-24-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-280-3869-24-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 280\/3869\/24 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Decision of the Zaporizhzhia City Council on Amending the Procedure for Leasing Municipal Property.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The Decision of the Zaporizhzhia City Council bears signs of a normative legal act, as it establishes general rules for regulating relations regarding the lease of municipal property.<\/p>\n<p>2. The Supreme Court deviates from the previous practice of appellate courts and clearly defines that such disputes fall under the jurisdiction of administrative courts.<\/p>\n<p>3. The Court emphasized that the local self-government body makes decisions within the framework of authoritative management functions, and therefore the dispute has a public law nature.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the ruling of the appellate administrative court and refer the case for a new review.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125967691\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Decision of the Zaporizhzhia City Council on Amending the Procedure for Leasing Municipal Property. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Decision of the Zaporizhzhia City Council bears signs of a normative legal act, as it establishes general rules for regulating relations regarding the lease of municipal property. 2. The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7350\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}