{"id":7236,"date":"2025-03-24T09:10:42","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-380-20516-21-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:10:42","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:10:42","slug":"case-no-380-20516-21-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-380-20516-21-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 380\/20516\/21 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of pension for a person who was seconded from military service to the prosecutor’s office, based on a certificate of monetary compensation.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– Newly discovered circumstances are legal facts that existed during the initial case review but were not known to the process participants.
\n– A change in the court’s legal position in other cases is not a newly discovered circumstance.
\n– The appellate court incorrectly applied procedural law norms when it satisfied the application for review of the decision based on newly discovered circumstances.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court’s resolution and reject the application for review of the judicial decision based on newly discovered circumstances.<\/p>\n

Important: – The court clearly stated that a change in legal position in other cases cannot be grounds for reviewing a judicial decision.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of pension for a person who was seconded from military service to the prosecutor’s office, based on a certificate of monetary compensation. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – Newly discovered circumstances are legal facts that existed during the initial case review but were not known…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7236"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7236\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}