{"id":7232,"date":"2025-03-24T09:07:41","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-902-862-23-dated-26-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:07:41","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:07:41","slug":"case-no-902-862-23-dated-26-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-902-862-23-dated-26-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 902\/862\/23 dated 26\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Illegality of Provisions in the Vinnytsia City Council Decision on Terminating the Permanent Land Use Right of a UOC Religious Community.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\nThe court confirmed the previous legal position that a religious organization which has not changed its name in accordance with the law on religious organizations loses its status as a religious organization. This means that it automatically loses the right to permanent land use. The court considers that the religious community&#8217;s failure to comply with the law&#8217;s requirements regarding name change is grounds for terminating its land rights.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: To leave the cassation appeal unsatisfied and the appellate court ruling unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125983099\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Illegality of Provisions in the Vinnytsia City Council Decision on Terminating the Permanent Land Use Right of a UOC Religious Community. 2. Key Court Arguments: The court confirmed the previous legal position that a religious organization which has not changed its name in accordance with&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}