{"id":7230,"date":"2025-03-24T09:06:49","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:06:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-11334-23-dated-18-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:06:49","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:06:49","slug":"case-no-910-11334-23-dated-18-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-11334-23-dated-18-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/11334\/23 dated 18\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of 7,236,000 UAH in damages from the state budget, allegedly caused by unlawful actions of the Kyiv Customs during cargo clearance.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The plaintiff paid penalty sanctions to the carrier for vehicle downtime<br \/>\n&#8211; However, the court established that these sanctions had no legal grounds, because:<br \/>\na) The parties to the contract acknowledged the absence of plaintiff&#8217;s fault in the downtime<br \/>\nb) Penalty can only be levied in the presence of fault<br \/>\nc) The payment cannot be considered damages, as it had no objective grounds<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Deny recovery of 7,236,000 UAH from the state budget.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court essentially deviated from previous judicial practice of automatic recovery of damages from government authorities.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125983081\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of 7,236,000 UAH in damages from the state budget, allegedly caused by unlawful actions of the Kyiv Customs during cargo clearance. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The plaintiff paid penalty sanctions to the carrier for vehicle downtime &#8211; However, the court established that these&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}