{"id":7228,"date":"2025-03-24T09:05:23","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-903-347-24-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:05:23","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:05:23","slug":"case-no-903-347-24-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-903-347-24-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 903\/347\/24 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Monetary Claims of Creditors in the Bankruptcy Case of the State Enterprise “Research Farm ‘Peremoga'”.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The court confirmed the monetary claims of LLC “Zakhid-Agro-Tekhnika” and LLC “LIV-Tekhnik”, as they are confirmed by court decisions.
\n– The court noted that indisputable creditor claims can be reviewed only in exceptional cases.
\n– Regarding the claims of LLC “Trading Enterprise ‘Agrohim-Partner'”, the court pointed to the need for additional investigation of primary documents.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the cassation appeal – leave unchanged the decision regarding the claims of LLC “Zakhid-Agro-Tekhnika” and LLC “LIV-Tekhnik”, cancel the decision regarding the claims of LLC “Trading Enterprise ‘Agrohim-Partner'” and send the case for a new review.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Monetary Claims of Creditors in the Bankruptcy Case of the State Enterprise “Research Farm ‘Peremoga’”. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The court confirmed the monetary claims of LLC “Zakhid-Agro-Tekhnika” and LLC “LIV-Tekhnik”, as they are confirmed by court decisions. – The court noted…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}