{"id":7226,"date":"2025-03-24T09:04:53","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:04:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-453-22-dated-19-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T09:04:53","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:04:53","slug":"case-no-917-453-22-dated-19-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-453-22-dated-19-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 917\/453\/22 dated 19\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the illegal state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” for a non-residential premises previously owned by the state.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\n– Corporatization of a state enterprise is not privatization
\n– Transfer of property to the authorized capital does not change the form of ownership
\n– State property remains state-owned, even after the creation of a joint-stock company
\n– Alienation of such property is possible only through privatization<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The prosecutor’s claim was satisfied – the state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” was canceled and ownership rights were recognized for the state.<\/p>\n

: The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding the change of state property ownership form.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the illegal state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” for a non-residential premises previously owned by the state. 2. Main Court Arguments: – Corporatization of a state enterprise is not privatization – Transfer of property to the authorized capital…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7226"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7226\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}