{"id":7208,"date":"2025-03-23T09:27:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:27:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-444-24-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:27:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:27:04","slug":"case-no-922-444-24-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-444-24-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 922\/444\/24 dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt under a natural gas supply agreement and accrued penalty sanctions from a budgetary institution.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Defendant partially failed to fulfill obligations due to territory occupation<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court considered the complex circumstances of wartime and reduced the amount of penalty sanctions<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court confirmed the right to reduce penalty sanctions if they are disproportionately large<br \/>\n&#8211; The extent of reduction depends on the specific circumstances of each case<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: To leave previous court decisions unchanged, which partially satisfied the claim and reduced the amount of penalty sanctions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125946811\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt under a natural gas supply agreement and accrued penalty sanctions from a budgetary institution. 2. Key Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The Defendant partially failed to fulfill obligations due to territory occupation &#8211; The Court considered the complex circumstances of wartime and reduced the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}