{"id":7204,"date":"2025-03-23T09:25:16","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-6287-23-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:25:16","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:25:16","slug":"case-no-910-6287-23-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-6287-23-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/6287\/23 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of monetary funds for non-fulfillment of a supply contract for peat and carbon briquettes between a military unit and an individual entrepreneur.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Respondent partially supplied goods for the amount of 2,604,568.00 UAH against a preliminary payment of 2,739,600.00 UAH<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court took into account force majeure circumstances of wartime that complicated contract performance<br \/>\n&#8211; It was established that the Respondent attempted to fulfill contractual obligations despite difficult conditions<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Previous decision was canceled and the case was referred for a new review to the appellate commercial court for additional examination of case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The Court deviated from its previous position regarding full recovery of claimed amounts and considered force majeure circumstances of wartime.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125911100\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of monetary funds for non-fulfillment of a supply contract for peat and carbon briquettes between a military unit and an individual entrepreneur. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The Respondent partially supplied goods for the amount of 2,604,568.00 UAH against a&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7204\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}