{"id":7184,"date":"2025-03-23T09:14:25","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-990-36-23-dated-06-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:14:25","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:14:25","slug":"case-no-990-36-23-dated-06-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-990-36-23-dated-06-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 990\/36\/23 dated 06\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Decree of the President of Ukraine on Applying Sanctions to an Individual for a Period of 10 Years.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; Sanctions were applied legally on the basis of the Law &#8220;On Sanctions&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8211; There is evidence of the person&#8217;s involvement in actions threatening Ukraine&#8217;s national security<br \/>\n&#8211; In particular, there is information about the person&#8217;s cooperation with terrorist organizations &#8220;LPR&#8221; and &#8220;DPR&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8211; Sanctions have a preventive nature and are proportional to the purpose of protecting state interests<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: To leave the appeal without satisfaction, and the previous court decision unchanged.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice in terms of interpreting the range of persons to whom sanctions may be applied.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125933390\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Decree of the President of Ukraine on Applying Sanctions to an Individual for a Period of 10 Years. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; Sanctions were applied legally on the basis of the Law &#8220;On Sanctions&#8221; &#8211; There is evidence of the person&#8217;s involvement&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7184\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}