{"id":7178,"date":"2025-03-23T09:11:10","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:11:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-489-5087-20-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:11:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:11:10","slug":"case-no-489-5087-20-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-489-5087-20-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 489\/5087\/20 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation appeal of the verdict against PERSON_7, convicted of serious violent crimes, including robbery, unlawful deprivation of liberty, and extortion, with challenging the imposed property confiscation.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. The court recognized that confiscation of all property may violate the rights of other family members living in the house.<br \/>\n2. It was established that the house was purchased by the convict&#8217;s father in 2000, when the convict was 7 years old.<br \/>\n3. Nine people are registered and living in the house, including a disabled mother, a disabled sister, and minor children.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The court partially satisfied the cassation appeal and modified the verdict, excluding the confiscation of housing, while leaving the rest of the punishment unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125933299\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation appeal of the verdict against PERSON_7, convicted of serious violent crimes, including robbery, unlawful deprivation of liberty, and extortion, with challenging the imposed property confiscation. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The court recognized that confiscation of all property may violate the rights of other family members living in the house.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7178"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7178\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}