{"id":7176,"date":"2025-03-23T09:09:41","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:09:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-463-597-16-c-dated-19-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:09:41","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:09:41","slug":"case-no-463-597-16-c-dated-19-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-463-597-16-c-dated-19-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 463\/597\/16-c dated 19\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the city council’s decision to grant a land plot to a third party, contrary to the plaintiff’s previously submitted application.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The city council violated the procedure for reviewing the land application by not bringing it to the session
\n– The court decision obligated consideration of the plaintiff’s application, but this was not done
\n– The court emphasized that the person who first began the land plot formation has priority right to obtain it
\n– The city council’s decision was made in violation of legislation and infringes upon the plaintiff’s rights<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Leave the cassation appeal unsatisfied, keep the appellate court’s resolution unchanged, thereby supporting the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the city council’s decision to grant a land plot to a third party, contrary to the plaintiff’s previously submitted application. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The city council violated the procedure for reviewing the land application by not bringing it to the session –…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}