{"id":7164,"date":"2025-03-23T09:04:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:04:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-1416-7113-12-dated-26-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-23T09:04:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-23T07:04:11","slug":"case-no-1416-7113-12-dated-26-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-1416-7113-12-dated-26-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 1416\/7113\/12 dated 26\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging a \u0417\u0430\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u0440\u0456\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 (default court judgment) on debt recovery under a credit agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. The Appellate Court incorrectly determined the term for appellate appeal, mistakenly believing it to be 10 days.<br \/>\n2. According to current procedural legislation, the term for appellate appeal is 30 days.<br \/>\n3. At the time of filing the appellate complaint (October 17, 2024), the term had not been missed.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court satisfied the cassation complaint, revoked the appellate court&#8217;s ruling, and referred the case for a new hearing to the appellate court.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding the calculation of appellate appeal terms, emphasizing the need to apply the procedural law in effect at the time of the procedural action.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125933058\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: Challenging a \u0417\u0430\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u0440\u0456\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 (default court judgment) on debt recovery under a credit agreement. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Appellate Court incorrectly determined the term for appellate appeal, mistakenly believing it to be 10 days. 2. According to current procedural legislation, the term for appellate&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}