{"id":7144,"date":"2025-03-22T09:23:16","date_gmt":"2025-03-22T07:23:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-538-24917-872-24-dated-17-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-22T09:23:16","modified_gmt":"2025-03-22T07:23:16","slug":"case-no-917-538-24917-872-24-dated-17-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-917-538-24917-872-24-dated-17-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 917\/538\/24(917\/872\/24) dated 17\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Ruling on Recognition of Creditors&#8217; Claims in Bankruptcy Case.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The court clearly determined that rulings on recognition of creditors&#8217; claims in a bankruptcy case cannot be appealed separately from the court&#8217;s decision.<br \/>\n&#8211; The appellate court erroneously refused to open proceedings, referring to missed time limits, instead of returning the appellate complaint.<br \/>\n&#8211; The right to appeal such a ruling arises only after the court issues a ruling following the preliminary hearing.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Leave the cassation complaint without satisfaction, but modify the appellate court&#8217;s ruling by returning the appellate complaint to the applicant.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125911112\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Ruling on Recognition of Creditors&#8217; Claims in Bankruptcy Case. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The court clearly determined that rulings on recognition of creditors&#8217; claims in a bankruptcy case cannot be appealed separately from the court&#8217;s decision. &#8211; The appellate court erroneously refused&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}