{"id":7142,"date":"2025-03-22T09:22:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-22T07:22:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-921-576-23-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-22T09:22:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-22T07:22:48","slug":"case-no-921-576-23-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-921-576-23-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 921\/576\/23 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Additional Agreements to Land Lease Contracts as Concluded and Renewal of Lease Legal Relations.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; Non-preparation of agrochemical passports for land plots constitutes improper performance of contractual obligations<br \/>\n&#8211; This prevents soil condition monitoring and creates risks of soil contamination<br \/>\n&#8211; Such circumstances make it impossible to apply Article 33 of the Law &#8220;On Land Lease&#8221; regarding contract renewal<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Completely reject the claim of PE &#8220;Zakhidnyi Buh&#8221; regarding recognition of additional agreements as concluded.<\/p>\n<p>: The court deviated from previous judicial practice, detailing the conditions for renewing land lease contracts.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125911132\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Additional Agreements to Land Lease Contracts as Concluded and Renewal of Lease Legal Relations. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; Non-preparation of agrochemical passports for land plots constitutes improper performance of contractual obligations &#8211; This prevents soil condition monitoring and creates risks of soil&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}