{"id":7102,"date":"2025-03-21T09:35:49","date_gmt":"2025-03-21T07:35:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-179-36-22-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-21T09:35:49","modified_gmt":"2025-03-21T07:35:49","slug":"case-no-179-36-22-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-179-36-22-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 179\/36\/22 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the order on land plot lease as illegal and recovery of a land plot located within the landscape reserve &#8220;Pryorilskyi&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The disputed land plot belongs to the nature reserve fund lands and is located within the landscape reserve of national significance &#8220;Pryorilskyi&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8211; The Main Directorate of the State Geocadaster did not have the right to dispose of this land plot<br \/>\n&#8211; The change of land plot&#8217;s intended purpose occurred without coordination with authorized bodies<br \/>\n&#8211; Using the land plot for haymaking and cattle grazing contradicts the nature reserve fund regime<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Return the land plot to the state, cancel the order on plot lease, while refusing to declare the lease agreement invalid.<\/p>\n<p>Important: The court deviated from previous practice regarding the method of protecting state rights on nature reserve fund lands, proposing to use a negative action instead of a vindication claim.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125876137\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the order on land plot lease as illegal and recovery of a land plot located within the landscape reserve &#8220;Pryorilskyi&#8221;. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; The disputed land plot belongs to the nature reserve fund lands and is located within the landscape reserve of national&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}