{"id":7076,"date":"2025-03-21T09:25:44","date_gmt":"2025-03-21T07:25:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-201-7848-21-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-21T09:25:44","modified_gmt":"2025-03-21T07:25:44","slug":"case-no-201-7848-21-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-201-7848-21-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 201\/7848\/21 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Compensation for damage caused to an individual as a result of an illegal administrative offense report compiled by a patrol police inspector.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n– It was established that the report was compiled with violations due to improper accident documentation by the investigator
\n– The plaintiff suffered moral damage as a result of illegal administrative prosecution
\n– The court recognized the right to partial compensation for material and moral damages<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: To recover from the state in favor of the plaintiff:
\n– 20,100 UAH for moral damages
\n– 675.37 UAH for material expenses
\n– 7,553 UAH for court costs<\/p>\n

Important: The court deviated from previous practice regarding damage compensation by police authorities.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Compensation for damage caused to an individual as a result of an illegal administrative offense report compiled by a patrol police inspector. 2. Key Court Arguments: – It was established that the report was compiled with violations due to improper accident documentation by the investigator – The…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7076\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}