{"id":7040,"date":"2025-03-20T09:42:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-343-1061-24-dated-14-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T09:42:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:42:11","slug":"case-no-343-1061-24-dated-14-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-343-1061-24-dated-14-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 343\/1061\/24 dated 14\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

The case concerns appealing an administrative penalty order for traffic rule violation.<\/p>\n

The court thoroughly analyzed the procedural issues of filing an appeal by a lawyer and concluded that an electronic warrant signed with a qualified electronic signature is a full-fledged document confirming the representative’s authority. The Supreme Court essentially deviated from previous practice, recognizing the electronic signature on the warrant as equally valid as a handwritten signature.<\/p>\n

The court revoked the decision of the appellate administrative court and remanded the case for reconsideration.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The case concerns appealing an administrative penalty order for traffic rule violation. The court thoroughly analyzed the procedural issues of filing an appeal by a lawyer and concluded that an electronic warrant signed with a qualified electronic signature is a full-fledged document confirming the representative’s authority. The Supreme Court essentially deviated from previous practice, recognizing…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}