{"id":7038,"date":"2025-03-20T09:41:32","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-580-6254-22-dated-14-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T09:41:32","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:41:32","slug":"case-no-580-6254-22-dated-14-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-580-6254-22-dated-14-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 580\/6254\/22 dated 14\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding pension recalculation from 71% to 70% of monetary allowance for a pensioner.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the disputed legal relations are personal and directly related to a specific pensioner, therefore legal succession in this case is impossible. The court emphasized that the rights to pension recalculation are non-property rights and cannot be inherited, as they are inextricably linked to the person of the pensioner.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court reversed previous court decisions and closed the proceedings, effectively not allowing the deceased pensioner&#8217;s wife to continue the legal dispute about pension recalculation.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125855174\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding pension recalculation from 71% to 70% of monetary allowance for a pensioner. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the disputed legal relations are personal and directly related to a specific pensioner, therefore legal succession in this case is impossible. The court emphasized that the rights to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}