{"id":7026,"date":"2025-03-20T09:37:45","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:37:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-740-1664-21-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T09:37:45","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:37:45","slug":"case-no-740-1664-21-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-740-1664-21-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 740\/1664\/21 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Recovery of debt for thermal energy from individuals in favor of LLC &#8220;NizhynTeploMerezh\u0456&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Main arguments of the court: The Supreme Court drew attention that the appellate court incorrectly applied bankruptcy regulations, since the circumstances regarding the enterprise&#8217;s bankruptcy were or could have been known to the parties to the case during the initial consideration. The court emphasized that review based on newly discovered circumstances does not involve a repeated assessment of all evidence, but only the establishment of fundamentally new circumstances that could significantly influence the decision.<\/p>\n<p>Court decision: To cancel the resolution of the appellate court and refer the case for a new hearing to the Chernihiv Appellate Court.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125843162\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute: Recovery of debt for thermal energy from individuals in favor of LLC &#8220;NizhynTeploMerezh\u0456&#8221;. Main arguments of the court: The Supreme Court drew attention that the appellate court incorrectly applied bankruptcy regulations, since the circumstances regarding the enterprise&#8217;s bankruptcy were or could have been known to the parties to the case during&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}