{"id":7000,"date":"2025-03-20T09:25:21","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-461-9003-20-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T09:25:21","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:25:21","slug":"case-no-461-9003-20-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-461-9003-20-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 461\/9003\/20 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Review of a Judicial Decision Based on Newly Discovered Circumstances in Criminal Proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the Court of Appeal incorrectly closed the proceedings on PERSON_1&#8217;s application for review of the judicial decision. The Court of Appeal essentially examined the application on its merits, but instead of making a decision in accordance with procedural law, simply closed the proceedings and returned the application. This violates the person&#8217;s right of access to justice and the procedural norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court partially satisfied the cassation appeal, revoked the ruling of the Lviv Court of Appeal, and assigned a new review of the case in the appellate instance.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125825780\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Review of a Judicial Decision Based on Newly Discovered Circumstances in Criminal Proceedings. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the Court of Appeal incorrectly closed the proceedings on PERSON_1&#8217;s application for review of the judicial decision. The Court of Appeal essentially examined the application on its merits, but&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}