{"id":6998,"date":"2025-03-20T09:23:24","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:23:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-372-4508-21-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T09:23:24","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T07:23:24","slug":"case-no-372-4508-21-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-372-4508-21-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 372\/4508\/21 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Reclaiming Real Estate (Pharmacy Premises and Land Plot) and Invalidation of Mortgage Agreement.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; Property was removed from the possession of owner PERSON_1 as a result of invalid public auction<br \/>\n&#8211; Owner has the right to reclaim property from a bona fide acquirer if it was removed against their will<br \/>\n&#8211; The issue of the statute of limitations commencement requires additional investigation by the appellate court<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Cassation appeal partially satisfied, appellate court ruling canceled, case referred for new consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from its previous position regarding calculation of the statute of limitations in property reclamation cases.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125809176\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Reclaiming Real Estate (Pharmacy Premises and Land Plot) and Invalidation of Mortgage Agreement. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; Property was removed from the possession of owner PERSON_1 as a result of invalid public auction &#8211; Owner has the right to reclaim property from a bona fide acquirer&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6998\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}