{"id":6875,"date":"2025-03-17T09:20:01","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:20:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-2158-24-dated-12-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T09:20:01","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:20:01","slug":"case-no-922-2158-24-dated-12-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-922-2158-24-dated-12-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 922\/2158\/24 dated 12\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recovery of Debt for License Fees for Conducting Gambling Activities.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The court established that the dispute has a public law nature, since the Commission for Gambling and Lottery Regulation (CGLR) acts as a subject of authoritative powers, which implements state policy in the gambling sphere. The legal relations are aimed at resolving the issue of budget payments, which has a public, rather than a private interest. Therefore, the dispute is subject to consideration under administrative judicial proceedings, not commercial proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the previous court decisions on closing the proceedings in the commercial court and referring the case to the administrative court.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125804493\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recovery of Debt for License Fees for Conducting Gambling Activities. Main Arguments of the Court: The court established that the dispute has a public law nature, since the Commission for Gambling and Lottery Regulation (CGLR) acts as a subject of authoritative powers, which implements state policy in the gambling sphere. The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}