{"id":6863,"date":"2025-03-17T09:13:08","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:13:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-140-2037-23-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T09:13:08","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:13:08","slug":"case-no-140-2037-23-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-140-2037-23-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 140\/2037\/23 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the orders of the Ministry of Environmental Protection regarding the approval of the territory organization project for Kivertsi National Nature Park “Tsumanska Pushcha”.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– Functional zoning of the national nature park’s territory must be carried out in coordination with land plot owners.
\n– Previous instance courts improperly verified the procedure for issuing orders and did not clarify whether the rights of the agricultural enterprise were observed when including its lands in the park.
\n– The Supreme Court deviates from previous practice regarding the review of individual acts, indicating that such acts may concern land users’ rights.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for detailed examination of the case circumstances.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the orders of the Ministry of Environmental Protection regarding the approval of the territory organization project for Kivertsi National Nature Park “Tsumanska Pushcha”. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – Functional zoning of the national nature park’s territory must be carried out in coordination with land…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6863\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}