{"id":6861,"date":"2025-03-17T09:12:02","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:12:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-2750-23-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T09:12:02","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:12:02","slug":"case-no-904-2750-23-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-2750-23-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 904\/2750\/23 dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor on behalf of the Novomoskovsk City Council demanded the demolition of unauthorized structures on a water fund land plot and termination of individual entrepreneur Huseynova M.’s ownership rights to these objects.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n– Disputed buildings are located in the coastal protection zone of the Samara River without land allocation and necessary permits
\n– Objects constitute unauthorized construction in accordance with Article 376 of the Civil Code of Ukraine
\n– State registration of ownership rights for unauthorized construction does not change its legal regime
\n– The landowner has the right to demand demolition of illegal structures<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The prosecutor’s claim was fully satisfied – mandating demolition of buildings and termination of individual entrepreneur Huseynova M.’s ownership rights to the disputed objects.<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding methods of protecting the landowner’s rights.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor on behalf of the Novomoskovsk City Council demanded the demolition of unauthorized structures on a water fund land plot and termination of individual entrepreneur Huseynova M.’s ownership rights to these objects. 2. Key Court Arguments: – Disputed buildings are located in the coastal protection zone…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6861\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}