{"id":6857,"date":"2025-03-17T09:08:08","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:08:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-160-31127-23-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T09:08:08","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T07:08:08","slug":"case-no-160-31127-23-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-160-31127-23-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 160\/31127\/23 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s refusal to grant a service pension to a criminal executive service employee as unlawful.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Law on the State Criminal Executive Service provides for preferential service years calculation (1 month of service counted as 40 days)<br \/>\n&#8211; Preferential calculation does not change the actual service duration, but accelerates the right to pension<br \/>\n&#8211; The plaintiff has a preferential service of 42 years, which grants the right to pension assignment<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Satisfy the claim and oblige the Pension Fund to assign a service pension starting from 31.08.2023.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding interpretation of preferential service years calculation procedure.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125788242\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s refusal to grant a service pension to a criminal executive service employee as unlawful. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; The Law on the State Criminal Executive Service provides for preferential service years calculation (1 month of service counted as 40 days) &#8211;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6857\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}