{"id":6841,"date":"2025-03-16T09:34:20","date_gmt":"2025-03-16T07:34:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-909-68-24-dated-04-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-16T09:34:20","modified_gmt":"2025-03-16T07:34:20","slug":"case-no-909-68-24-dated-04-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-909-68-24-dated-04-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 909\/68\/24 dated 04\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Ivano-Frankivsk City Council demands the recovery of a land plot with an area of 6.2207 hectares from the illegal possession of LLC &#8220;IOLIT &#8211; IF&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The disputed land plot is located within the territory of Ivano-Frankivsk City Council<br \/>\n&#8211; Vovchynetsk Village Council illegally disposed of the land plot beyond its powers<br \/>\n&#8211; The land plot was alienated from the municipal property of the city council contrary to its will<br \/>\n&#8211; Court decisions in administrative cases confirmed the unlawfulness of the village council&#8217;s actions<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court cancelled the resolution of the appellate commercial court and referred the case for a new review to further examine the circumstances regarding the statute of limitations.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The Court deviated from previous practice in determining the start of the statute of limitations in cases of recovering municipal property.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125768936\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Ivano-Frankivsk City Council demands the recovery of a land plot with an area of 6.2207 hectares from the illegal possession of LLC &#8220;IOLIT &#8211; IF&#8221;. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The disputed land plot is located within the territory of Ivano-Frankivsk City Council &#8211; Vovchynetsk&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}