{"id":6823,"date":"2025-03-16T09:27:49","date_gmt":"2025-03-16T07:27:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-4027-22-dated-11-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-16T09:27:49","modified_gmt":"2025-03-16T07:27:49","slug":"case-no-904-4027-22-dated-11-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-4027-22-dated-11-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 904\/4027\/22 dated 11\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Imposing subsidiary liability on the founder of LLC “PROBILD” in the bankruptcy case for the amount of 1,022,909.00 UAH.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that the appellate court unjustifiably suspended the proceedings due to the defendant’s service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The court established that:
\n– The mere fact of a person’s service in the Armed Forces is not sufficient grounds for suspending the proceedings
\n– It has not been proven that the military unit was actually transferred to a martial law status
\n– The defendant had the opportunity to participate in the process through a lawyer<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court’s ruling on suspending the proceedings and refer the case for a new review.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Imposing subsidiary liability on the founder of LLC “PROBILD” in the bankruptcy case for the amount of 1,022,909.00 UAH. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that the appellate court unjustifiably suspended the proceedings due to the defendant’s service in the Armed Forces…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6823"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6823\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}