{"id":6773,"date":"2025-03-15T09:29:18","date_gmt":"2025-03-15T07:29:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-727-1506-23-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-15T09:29:18","modified_gmt":"2025-03-15T07:29:18","slug":"case-no-727-1506-23-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-727-1506-23-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 727\/1506\/23 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation Appeal of a Sentence against a Person Convicted of Illegal Sale of Psychotropic Substances.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deemed the evidence for the episode of October 24, 2022, inadmissible due to untimely entry of information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations, which made it impossible to prove the person&#8217;s guilt. The court took into account the personal circumstances of the convicted person, including the presence of three minor children, absence of previous convictions, and undergoing drug addiction treatment.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The court partially granted the cassation appeal, excluded the episode of October 24, 2022, and mitigated the punishment to 1 year of imprisonment with confiscation of property.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125711066\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation Appeal of a Sentence against a Person Convicted of Illegal Sale of Psychotropic Substances. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court deemed the evidence for the episode of October 24, 2022, inadmissible due to untimely entry of information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations, which made it impossible to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}