{"id":6721,"date":"2025-03-14T09:28:38","date_gmt":"2025-03-14T07:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-18717-23-dated-06-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-14T09:28:38","modified_gmt":"2025-03-14T07:28:38","slug":"case-no-910-18717-23-dated-06-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-18717-23-dated-06-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/18717\/23 dated 06\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of damages from the state budget due to unlawful seizure and sale of sunflower seeds from the 2018 harvest.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Prosecutor&#8217;s Office and ARMA improperly arrested and sold 304.54 tons of sunflower seeds belonging to LLC &#8220;Agrofirma &#8220;Shabolat&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8211; The arrest order was canceled by the appellate court as illegal<br \/>\n&#8211; Property sale occurred without proper legal grounds<br \/>\n&#8211; The value of seeds was 10,500 UAH per ton, confirmed by independent expertise<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: To recover from the state budget in favor of LLC &#8220;Agrofirma &#8220;Shabolat&#8221; 3,197,670 UAH in damages.<\/p>\n<p>Important: The court deviated from previous judicial practice, clearly defining the unlawfulness of state authorities&#8217; actions in property arrest and sale.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125709871\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of damages from the state budget due to unlawful seizure and sale of sunflower seeds from the 2018 harvest. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; The Prosecutor&#8217;s Office and ARMA improperly arrested and sold 304.54 tons of sunflower seeds belonging to LLC &#8220;Agrofirma &#8220;Shabolat&#8221; &#8211; The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}