{"id":6673,"date":"2025-03-13T09:39:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-13T07:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-201-16688-16-c-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-13T09:39:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-13T07:39:11","slug":"case-no-201-16688-16-c-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-201-16688-16-c-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 201\/16688\/16-c dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

Subject of Dispute: Recovery of credit debt from an individual under a credit agreement concluded in 2007.<\/p>\n

Key Arguments of the Court:
\n1. The bank did not comply with the mandatory pre-trial procedure for resolving the issue of early repayment of funds under a consumer loan, as provided by the law “On Consumer Protection”.
\n2. At the same time, the court established that the bank sent a demand for loan repayment on December 22, 2018, which is confirmed by a separate court decision.
\n3. The court deviates from previous practice and considers that sending a demand for early loan repayment does not deprive the bank of the right to judicial protection.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: To cancel previous court decisions regarding the refusal to recover debt and send the case for a new appellate review to finally determine the amount of debt.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: Recovery of credit debt from an individual under a credit agreement concluded in 2007. Key Arguments of the Court: 1. The bank did not comply with the mandatory pre-trial procedure for resolving the issue of early repayment of funds under a consumer loan, as provided by the law…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}