{"id":6551,"date":"2025-03-10T09:32:13","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:32:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-240-12857-24-dated-06-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:32:13","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:32:13","slug":"case-no-240-12857-24-dated-06-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-240-12857-24-dated-06-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 240\/12857\/24 dated 06\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A female servicemember challenges the incorrect calculation of monetary allowance indexation for the period from March 2018 to August 2021.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The court established that previous court decisions incorrectly assessed the mechanism of calculating the &#8220;indexation difference&#8221; according to paragraphs 3-6 of item 5 of Procedure No. 1078.<\/p>\n<p>2. To correctly calculate the indexation, it is necessary to establish: the amount of income increase in March 2018, the amount of possible indexation, and whether the income increase exceeds the indexation amount.<\/p>\n<p>3. Previous courts approached the case formally and did not investigate all necessary circumstances for correct indexation calculation.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Annul previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for a detailed examination of the case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125656535\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: A female servicemember challenges the incorrect calculation of monetary allowance indexation for the period from March 2018 to August 2021. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The court established that previous court decisions incorrectly assessed the mechanism of calculating the &#8220;indexation difference&#8221; according to paragraphs 3-6 of item 5 of Procedure No.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}