{"id":6541,"date":"2025-03-10T09:27:38","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:27:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-120-6045-24-dated-06-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:27:38","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:27:38","slug":"case-no-120-6045-24-dated-06-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-120-6045-24-dated-06-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 120\/6045\/24 dated 06\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging court rulings regarding return and non-acceptance of an appeal by a person with a disability due to non-compliance of documents confirming disability status.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; Medical and Social Expert Commission (MSEC) certificate is a valid document for confirming disability and exemption from court fees<br \/>\n&#8211; The Law &#8220;On Court Fees&#8221; does not require mandatory possession of a special identification card<br \/>\n&#8211; The appellate court incorrectly interpreted procedural norms and groundlessly returned the appeal<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Rescind previous appellate court rulings and refer the case for new consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Important: The court essentially deviated from previous practice regarding requirements for disability documents.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125656545\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging court rulings regarding return and non-acceptance of an appeal by a person with a disability due to non-compliance of documents confirming disability status. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; Medical and Social Expert Commission (MSEC) certificate is a valid document for confirming disability and exemption from court&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6541\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}