{"id":6531,"date":"2025-03-10T09:21:51","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:21:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-903-622-24-dated-25-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:21:51","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:21:51","slug":"case-no-903-622-24-dated-25-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-903-622-24-dated-25-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 903\/622\/24 dated 25\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery by Horodok City Council from PE “Universam” of rental fee arrears for a land plot in the amount of 1,958,024.90 UAH.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\n– Previous instance courts believed that the plaintiff incorrectly calculated the rental fee, unjustifiably applying annual inflation coefficients on a cumulative basis.
\n– The Supreme Court established that courts incorrectly applied substantive law norms, particularly regarding the procedure for rent indexation.
\n– The Court deviated from previous rental fee calculation practice, indicating the need to consider the cumulative procedure for calculating inflationary losses.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for new consideration to the local commercial court for repeated analysis of the rental fee calculation.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery by Horodok City Council from PE “Universam” of rental fee arrears for a land plot in the amount of 1,958,024.90 UAH. 2. Main Court Arguments: – Previous instance courts believed that the plaintiff incorrectly calculated the rental fee, unjustifiably applying annual inflation coefficients on a cumulative…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6531\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}