{"id":6529,"date":"2025-03-10T09:20:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:20:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-759-212-20-dated-20-11-2024\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:20:57","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:20:57","slug":"case-no-759-212-20-dated-20-11-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-759-212-20-dated-20-11-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 759\/212\/20 dated 20\/11\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of bank deposit contributions, interest thereon, and compensation for moral damages.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>: The Supreme Court confirmed the previous legal position that replacement of the debtor in the obligation without the client&#8217;s written consent is unlawful. The bank remains responsible for returning deposits.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; The bank is obligated to return the plaintiff&#8217;s deposits, as she did not consent to debt transfer<br \/>\n&#8211; Interest is calculated only for the period until contract termination at contractual rates<br \/>\n&#8211; Three percent per annum may be recovered for the entire delay period<br \/>\n&#8211; Moral damages are subject to compensation due to prolonged non-return of funds<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision:<\/p>\n<p>Partially satisfy the claim &#8211; recover from the bank deposits, interest, three percent per annum, and compensation for moral damages totaling 35,000 hryvnias.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125627209\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of bank deposit contributions, interest thereon, and compensation for moral damages. 2. Key Court Arguments: : The Supreme Court confirmed the previous legal position that replacement of the debtor in the obligation without the client&#8217;s written consent is unlawful. The bank remains responsible for returning deposits.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}