{"id":6521,"date":"2025-03-10T09:17:25","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:17:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-5916-24-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:17:25","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:17:25","slug":"case-no-560-5916-24-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-5916-24-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 560\/5916\/24 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject of the dispute – appointment of a civil servant’s pension under the Law “On Civil Service” to a person who previously received a disability pension.<\/p>\n

The court drew attention to a fundamentally important legal position: a person who previously received a disability pension under the Law “On Civil Service” and was subsequently transferred to a pension under the Law “On Mandatory State Pension Insurance” has the right to re-appointment of a pension under the Law “On Civil Service”. The courts of previous instances did not provide a proper legal assessment of the case circumstances, in particular the plaintiff’s civil service length and documents confirming their right to a pension.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court revoked the decisions of previous instances and referred the case for a new review to thoroughly examine all circumstances and evidence.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject of the dispute – appointment of a civil servant’s pension under the Law “On Civil Service” to a person who previously received a disability pension. The court drew attention to a fundamentally important legal position: a person who previously received a disability pension under the Law “On Civil Service” and was subsequently transferred to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}