{"id":6519,"date":"2025-03-10T09:15:56","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:15:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-761-43346-23-dated-05-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:15:56","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:15:56","slug":"case-no-761-43346-23-dated-05-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-761-43346-23-dated-05-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 761\/43346\/23 dated 05\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Property Rights to an Apartment in Kyiv.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: First, the court emphasized that an attorney&#8217;s powers can be confirmed not only by a formally impeccable warrant but also by other documents, including a legal assistance agreement. Second, the existence of a certificate of the right to practice law, which has not been revoked, is sufficient confirmation of the representative&#8217;s status. Third, the court pointed out that formal deficiencies in the warrant cannot be grounds for depriving a person of the right to judicial protection.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court left the cassation appeal unsatisfied and supported the previous ruling of the appellate court to send the case for further consideration.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125639186\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Property Rights to an Apartment in Kyiv. Main Arguments of the Court: First, the court emphasized that an attorney&#8217;s powers can be confirmed not only by a formally impeccable warrant but also by other documents, including a legal assistance agreement. Second, the existence of a certificate of the right to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6519\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}