{"id":6493,"date":"2025-03-09T09:11:46","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:11:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-444-1289-23-dated-19-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-09T09:11:46","modified_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:11:46","slug":"case-no-444-1289-23-dated-19-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-444-1289-23-dated-19-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 444\/1289\/23 dated 19\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Determination of an Additional Period for Inheritance Acceptance after Husband&#8217;s Death.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court considers that the prolonged illness of the plaintiff, associated with mental disorders that existed both before the expiration of the six-month period for inheritance acceptance and continued at the time of court appeal, is a valid reason for missing the deadline for submitting an inheritance acceptance application. The court paid special attention to medical evidence confirming the plaintiff&#8217;s inability to independently make decisions due to a severe mental condition.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the court emphasized the importance of establishing the proper composition of defendants in the case and the necessity of involving the local self-government body, as the testamentary heirs have not actually accepted the inheritance.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the decisions of previous instances and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance for a complete and comprehensive investigation of the case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125605173\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Determination of an Additional Period for Inheritance Acceptance after Husband&#8217;s Death. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that the prolonged illness of the plaintiff, associated with mental disorders that existed both before the expiration of the six-month period for inheritance acceptance and continued at the time of court appeal,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6493","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6493"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6493\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6493"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}