{"id":6487,"date":"2025-03-09T09:08:54","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:08:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-760-12027-23-dated-19-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-09T09:08:54","modified_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:08:54","slug":"case-no-760-12027-23-dated-19-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-760-12027-23-dated-19-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 760\/12027\/23 dated 19\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Reinstatement of a diplomatic worker’s husband at Ukrtelekom JSC after her foreign assignment.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\n– Guarantee under Part 3 of Article 37 of the Law “On Diplomatic Service” applies ONLY to state-owned enterprises
\n– Ukrtelekom JSC is a private joint-stock company, therefore not subject to this provision
\n– The plaintiff did not meet all conditions for applying the legally prescribed guarantee<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Reject the claim for reinstatement.<\/p>\n

Note: The Supreme Court effectively narrowed the interpretation of the norm regarding guarantees for family members of diplomatic workers, clearly indicating its limitation to state-owned enterprises only.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Reinstatement of a diplomatic worker’s husband at Ukrtelekom JSC after her foreign assignment. 2. Main Court Arguments: – Guarantee under Part 3 of Article 37 of the Law “On Diplomatic Service” applies ONLY to state-owned enterprises – Ukrtelekom JSC is a private joint-stock…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6487\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}