{"id":6463,"date":"2025-03-08T09:42:16","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:42:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-440-4136-23-dated-04-03-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-08T09:42:16","modified_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:42:16","slug":"case-no-440-4136-23-dated-04-03-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-440-4136-23-dated-04-03-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 440\/4136\/23 dated 04\/03\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Resolution of the State Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety on Imposing an Administrative and Economic Fine on an Individual Entrepreneur for Improper Execution of a Waybill.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. The Supreme Court changed its previous position regarding the interpretation of legislation on transportation.<br \/>\n2. The Court considers that deficiencies in the execution of a waybill may be regarded as its absence.<br \/>\n3. The courts of previous instances did not fully investigate all circumstances of the case, in particular the video recording of the inspection and various versions of the waybill.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for a complete clarification of all circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125589536\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Resolution of the State Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety on Imposing an Administrative and Economic Fine on an Individual Entrepreneur for Improper Execution of a Waybill. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Supreme Court changed its previous position regarding the interpretation of legislation on transportation. 2. The Court&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}