{"id":6457,"date":"2025-03-08T09:40:15","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:40:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-947-19543-23-dated-18-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-08T09:40:15","modified_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:40:15","slug":"case-no-947-19543-23-dated-18-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-947-19543-23-dated-18-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 947\/19543\/23 dated 18\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Ownership Rights to an Apartment Located at 122 Fontanska Road.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>1. The court established that the plaintiff was properly notified about court hearings but did not appear.<\/p>\n<p>2. The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and noted that the plaintiff&#8217;s non-appearance cannot automatically lead to dismissal of the claim.<\/p>\n<p>3. The court took into account that the plaintiff filed motions, objections, and demonstrated an active procedural position, which indicates his interest in the case.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Reject the cassation appeal, upholding the appellate court&#8217;s ruling to send the case for a new review.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125558479\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recognition of Ownership Rights to an Apartment Located at 122 Fontanska Road. Main Court Arguments: 1. The court established that the plaintiff was properly notified about court hearings but did not appear. 2. The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice and noted that the plaintiff&#8217;s non-appearance cannot automatically lead to dismissal of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}