{"id":6447,"date":"2025-03-08T09:35:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:35:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-552-1759-19-dated-26-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-08T09:35:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:35:11","slug":"case-no-552-1759-19-dated-26-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-552-1759-19-dated-26-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 552\/1759\/19 dated 26\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Return of a Minor Child to the Permanent Place of Residence in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The Court emphasized that clarification of a court decision cannot alter the essence of the decision or establish a new procedure for execution.<\/p>\n<p>2. The issue of determining the method of executing a court decision falls within the competence of the court of first instance, not the appellate or cassation court.<\/p>\n<p>3. An application for clarification of a court decision may only relate to clarifying unclear parts of the decision, but not to changing its content or execution procedure.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court partially satisfied the cassation complaint, modifying the reasoning part of the appellate court&#8217;s ruling while leaving its operative part unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125556481\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Return of a Minor Child to the Permanent Place of Residence in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Court emphasized that clarification of a court decision cannot alter the essence of the decision or establish a new procedure for execution. 2. The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}