{"id":6348,"date":"2025-03-06T09:41:12","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:41:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-4462-24-dated-28-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-06T09:41:12","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:41:12","slug":"case-no-560-4462-24-dated-28-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-4462-24-dated-28-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 560\/4462\/24 dated 28\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor attempted to challenge the inaction of authorities regarding the failure to provide free meals to children from internally displaced persons at a vocational school.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that this case concerns the protection of specific children&#8217;s rights, not a state interest. The court emphasized that a prosecutor can represent state interests only in two cases: if an authority does not protect interests or such an authority is absent. In this case, the protection of children&#8217;s rights should be carried out by their parents or the prosecutor in the interests of a specific individual.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: The prosecutor&#8217;s cassation complaint was left unsatisfied, and the court decisions of previous instances remained unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125513195\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor attempted to challenge the inaction of authorities regarding the failure to provide free meals to children from internally displaced persons at a vocational school. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court considers that this case concerns the protection of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}