{"id":6338,"date":"2025-03-06T09:33:39","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:33:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-3743-22-dated-27-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-06T09:33:39","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:33:39","slug":"case-no-904-3743-22-dated-27-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-904-3743-22-dated-27-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 904\/3743\/22 dated 27\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a state executor regarding the initiation of enforcement proceedings in a territory included in the list of active combat zones.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The legislative prohibition concerns the place of initiating enforcement proceedings, not the location of the debtor&#8217;s registration<br \/>\n&#8211; The introduction of remote work does not change the location of the state executive service body<br \/>\n&#8211; The Nikopol Department of the State Executive Service is located in an active combat zone, which limits its powers<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court ruling and declare the state executor&#8217;s actions regarding the initiation of enforcement proceedings as unlawful.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125495807\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a state executor regarding the initiation of enforcement proceedings in a territory included in the list of active combat zones. 2. Key Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The legislative prohibition concerns the place of initiating enforcement proceedings, not the location of the debtor&#8217;s&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}