{"id":6328,"date":"2025-03-06T09:26:53","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:26:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-907-801-20-dated-18-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-06T09:26:53","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T07:26:53","slug":"case-no-907-801-20-dated-18-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-907-801-20-dated-18-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 907\/801\/20 dated 18\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the actions of the Main Directorate of the State Geocadastre as unlawful regarding the change of land plot purpose on the Borzhava meadow and their lease to LLC “Atlas Volovets Energy” for wind power plant construction.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:<\/p>\n

The court pointed out several fundamental violations in the land plot allocation:
\n– Absence of environmental impact assessment
\n– Violation of the legal regime of Emerald Network lands
\n– Non-establishment of sanitary protection zones
\n– Non-compliance with the territorial planning scheme<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The appellate court ruling has been revoked, and the case has been referred for new consideration.<\/p>\n

Key Thesis: Changing the purpose of lands with environmental protection status requires compliance with a special procedure and ecosystem impact assessment.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the actions of the Main Directorate of the State Geocadastre as unlawful regarding the change of land plot purpose on the Borzhava meadow and their lease to LLC “Atlas Volovets Energy” for wind power plant construction. 2. Main Court Arguments: The court pointed out several…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}