{"id":6208,"date":"2025-03-03T09:30:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-10319-22-dated-27-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-03T09:30:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:30:04","slug":"case-no-560-10319-22-dated-27-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-560-10319-22-dated-27-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 560\/10319\/22 dated 27\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor filed a lawsuit demanding that the Narkevychi Village Council bring the protective structure – radiation shelter – to a state of readiness.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\nThe Supreme Court concluded that the State Emergency Service does not have legally established powers to independently file lawsuits about bringing protective structures into proper condition. The court emphasized that a prosecutor can represent state interests only in two cases: when a government body does not provide protection or does so improperly, or when such a body does not exist at all.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The prosecutor’s cassation appeal was partially satisfied, court decisions of previous instances were amended by presenting motivational parts in a new version, but essentially the claim was left without satisfaction.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor filed a lawsuit demanding that the Narkevychi Village Council bring the protective structure – radiation shelter – to a state of readiness. 2. Main Court Arguments: The Supreme Court concluded that the State Emergency Service does not have legally established powers to independently file lawsuits…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}