{"id":6188,"date":"2025-03-03T09:21:14","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-183-4256-21-dated-24-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-03T09:21:14","modified_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:21:14","slug":"case-no-183-4256-21-dated-24-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-183-4256-21-dated-24-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 183\/4256\/21 dated 24\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Partial Invalidation of a Spousal Will and Recognition of Property Rights to a Land Plot through Statutory Inheritance.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court deviated from its previous legal position and formulated new conclusions regarding joint spousal wills. Key arguments:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; A joint spousal will may only concern property that is in joint shared ownership<br \/>\n&#8211; Disposing of personal property of one spouse in a joint will does not render it void<br \/>\n&#8211; In case of disposing of personal property in a joint will, such will loses effect in this part, and the property is subject to statutory inheritance<br \/>\n&#8211; One spouse cannot challenge a joint will<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Deny invalidation of the will, but modify the reasoning part of the decision in accordance with the new legal position.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125484180\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Partial Invalidation of a Spousal Will and Recognition of Property Rights to a Land Plot through Statutory Inheritance. 2. Key Court Arguments: The Supreme Court deviated from its previous legal position and formulated new conclusions regarding joint spousal wills. Key arguments: &#8211; A joint spousal will may&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6188\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}